Home › Forums › Support Forums › Feature Requests and Suggestions › Trial Conversion Bug
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
Master Toby Milroy.
Field 2: Desktop/Laptop
Field 3: Win10
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
October 4, 2017 at 8:08 AM #1326
TestUser1001
ParticipantCurrently my Trial Conversion is showing 200%. This would be impossible by any means of calculations. I currently have 2 trials, both of which are still trials. I have renewed and added new members but they were not trials.
-
October 4, 2017 at 11:07 AM #1334
Master Toby Milroy
KeymasterFrom you’re description, I think I can explain the confusion. (It’s nuanced)
If you click the “Label” above the spinner (“Trial Conversions”), it’ll show you how the calculations are handled.
In this case, it looks like you’ve had 4 trials from only 2 leads…therefore 200%.
So, you’re describing where you’ve only done 2 “official” trials, but a few enrollments (seems like 2)…..so, in order to keep fidelity in your school statistics (conversions from trial to enrollment), ATLAS calculates a “Trial” for every enrollment IF they ‘skip’ the trial stage (only for the purpose of stat calculation).
This way, you’ll have an accurate calculation.
If it did NOT do this….you’d have artificially high “Enrollment” conversion rates, if any student(s) skip the trial step.
For example, student walks in the door and simply signs up.
If we didn’t count them as a trial, you’d have a 1000% enrollment rate (1 enrollment for 0 trials….), but really, what you want is a 100% enrollment rate (1 enrollment for 1 trial).
In this case, ATLAS is helping keep the stats accurate for you……although I certainly see where it could be confused.

Is that making sense??
We’ll add some more descriptive content here to explain this better.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
Master Toby Milroy.
-
This reply was modified 8 years ago by
-
October 4, 2017 at 1:02 PM #1336
TestUser1001
ParticipantYes, this is very confusing. I can understand 2 leads, meaning I had Parents A has one kid and Parents B has 3 kids. However, wouldn’t that just be 4 prospects? After all what if 1 of the 3 kids from parent B did not sign up? I guess I am missing the logic of it all. This is how I would think it would be to give a more accurate account of trial conversions:
- 5 people come in = 5 prospects
- 2 go to trial, 2 go to enrollment. Trial Conversion = 0% (since we no one converted to actual program) Enrollment = 40% (2 out of 5 have enrolled)
- Now 1 person from Trial becomes member, other does not. Trial conversion = 50% 2 on trial/1 enrolled) Enrollment = 60% (3 out of 5 have enrolled)
- 4 people come in, 2 go directly to Trial, 2 go directly to Enrollment. So my numbers should look as follows 1 Prospect, 3 Trials, 5 Enrollments, which means we have 9 people. Trial conversion = 25% (4 on trial/1 enrolled) Enrollment = 56% (5 out of the 9 have enrolled in regular program.)
-
October 4, 2017 at 4:39 PM #1338
Master Toby Milroy
KeymasterYou premise above is logical, but the paradigm at present is conversion ratio(s) from “Stage to Stage”.
Similar to many CRM’s “Sales Pipeline” concept.
Here, we’re showing you the ratio “From” Prospect “To” Trial (or Intro – Whatever you’re “First Experience is for your folks), then “From” Trial” “To” Enrollment.
There really isn’t a way to conditional-ize these types of stats (at present).
So, in your above example…..In point number 2, you’re calculating a ratio from “Prospect” to “Enrollment”…and not Trial to Enrollment. So you’re premise is that the trial conversion would be 0%…but really should be 50%.
I think if you think about it “completely” linearly, it’ll make more sense.
I’ll have one of the team give you a buzz, and see if they can help!
You might also take a look at this:
http://ourams.com/7keysPerhaps useful???
Thanks again!
-
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Trial Conversion Bug’ is closed to new replies.